Language:
August 13, 2010
The legislation affecting copyright in Mexico includes:
Copyright legislation is enforced by:
The Copyright Office is in charge of:
The following types of works are copyrightable:
The following types of rights are covered by copyright:
The following may not be protected by copyright:
The doctrines of ‘fair use’ or ‘fair dealing’ do not exist as such in Mexican law. The comparable provisions for copyright limitations are as follows:
The author of a work of architecture may not prevent the owner of the said work from making alterations, but he or she shall have the right to prohibit his or her name from being associated with the altered work.
The rights of artists, interpreters and performers, audio and video producers, or broadcasting organisations, are not infringed by the use of their acts, recordings or broadcasts, when such works are reproduced, communicated and distributed by drawings, paintings, photographs and audio-visual means, visible from public places provided that:
The law does not define any standards to determine fair use.
Limitations are listed and interpreted literally.
Architectural works are copyrightable under the law. Plans are protected together with the physical constructions arising from the plans. The architectural works protected include all aspects that can be attributed as original to the author or architect designer. The law imposes one restriction: the author of an architectural work may not prevent the owner of the physical construction from making modifications to it. However, the author will have the right to refuse his or her name being associated with the modified work.
Public performance rights are covered by the Copyright Act. They are part of the bundle of patrimonial copyright rights, and if transferred, they may also be a remuneration right.
Mexico is a member of the Rome Convention and accordingly protects the rights of artistic performers, audio recording producers and broadcast entities. In addition, book publishers and video producers are entitled to related rights as well.
The Copyright Act protects moral rights of paternity, integrity, divulgation and withdrawal. Moral rights are personal rights that cannot be renounced, pledged or transmitted and that are imprescriptible.
There is no requirement of copyright notice.
There are no consequences for failure to display a copyright notice although the copyright law indicates that some sort of administrative infringements could arise.
There is no requirement of copyright deposit.
There are no consequences for failure to make a copyright notice. Ownership in copyright disputes can be proved by documentary or other evidence showing that the author created the work.
Works can be registered with the Copyright Office. Registration is not compulsory and copyright protection does not depend on registration. However, registration can represent reliable evidence in court since it represents prima facie evidence of copyright ownership.
Copyright registration is not mandatory.
To register a copyright, a person must file a simple application with two samples of the work and a fee. Particular information about contributors or creators is normally requested by the Copyright Office for commissioned works.
The application fee for copyright registration is approximately US$13.
There are no consequences for failure to register a copyrighted work. Ownership in copyright disputes may be proved by something else showing that the author created the work.
Generally, an author would be the first owner of the copyrighted work. Exceptions include:
Copyright ownership shall vest in the employer when parties have executed a labour agreement in writing and the same has a special work-for-hire clause. If the parties have signed a labour agreement without this special clause, copyright shall be split in equal shares. If parties have not signed a labour agreement, rights shall vest in the employee.
A hiring party may own the rights on a copyrighted work made by an independent contractor. Requirements are less strict than in the case of an employee’s works. It would be sufficient to show that a work has been commissioned and that there has been remuneration. If the two conditions are met, copyright ownership shall revert to the party that hired the work.
Works can be co-authored if they are jointly created by two or more authors, or else co-owned.
The Copyright Law sets forth rules in connection with the co-authorship of works, to distinguish between ‘collaborative’ works (authored jointly by two or more individuals) and ‘collective’ works (authored jointly by two or more individuals under the initiative of another individual or a corporation). Rules state as well that the rights of co-authors shall be shared in equal parts unless otherwise agreed.
Likewise, the Copyright Law sets forth rules in connection with co-ownership of works, including initial ownership rules, whether by authorship or work for hire or ownership by transfer. In keeping with this, physical individuals or corporations can be patrimonial rights-owners or co-owners.
Patrimonial rights can be transferred. Generally, transfers are not permanent. The law provides for limitations on transfers.
Patrimonial rights may be licensed.
The publication and translation of literary or artistic works, which are required for the development of science and culture and national education, may be the subject of a compulsory licence. This process is theoretically possible, but has never been done and a system would need to be put in place to do it.
In principle, licences are administered by the copyright or related rights-holders. Performing rights societies can administer them if copyright or related rights-holders become members thereof and grant a formal mandate to them to collect royalties or remuneration from users, by virtue of licences or otherwise.
There is provision for the termination of the transfer of copyright rights. Under the law, transfers are temporary and are subject to certain rules. Transfers are only valid for periods ranging between five and 15 years. A transfer in excess of 15 years is only valid in particular circumstances relating to the investment in the production of a work.
Documents evidencing transfers and other transactions can be recorded with the Copyright Office by way of an application or request.
Copyright protection begins from the moment the work is created.
Protection for patrimonial rights lasts throughout the lifetime of the author (or contributor) and for 100 years following the author’s death.
Copyright duration depends on when the work was authored and fixed into a tangible form of expression.
Terms of copyright do not have to be renewed.
The law categorises infringement into the following:
The following behaviour constitutes an infringement of copyright:
The following behaviour constitutes an infringement in trade when performed with direct or indirect commercial purposes:
The following remedies are available for copyright infringement:
There is a statute of limitations for civil and criminal remedies.
Monetary damages are available for copyright infringement. The applicable rule is that 40 per cent of the value of the infringing products will be awarded. The 40 per cent rule represents a minimum standard provision.
Attorneys’ fees and costs are available for copyright infringement but they are seldom recovered.
Imprisonment of between six months and six years, and a fine, will be imposed on:
Imprisonment of between six months and six years, and a fine, will be imposed on any person that sells copies of works, audio or video recordings or books to any final consumer in a public place and in a fraudulent manner for commercial purposes. If the sale takes place in a commercial establishment or in a permanent and organised manner, the infringer will be subject to sanction under the penal code.
Imprisonment of between six months and two years, or a fine will be imposed on whoever, knowingly and without right, exploits an artistic performance for commercial purposes.
Imprisonment of between six months and four years, and a fine will be imposed on:
Methods exist for pursuing online copyright infringement. The law provides copyright owners with a general right to pursue infringers regardless of the medium they employ. Although not expressly provided for in the law, the internet is certainly included. Likewise the principles of the WIPO treaties, including a right of access and the redefinition of the terms ‘fixation’ and ‘reproduction’ in a digital environment, have been implemented in law.
Copyright infringement is always hard to prevent. However, copyright law recognises and protects against infringements relating to technology protection.
Mexico belongs to most multinational treaties on copyright and neighbouring rights. It is also a member of a number of bilateral agreements, in particular on free trade and those dealing with copyright and neighbouring rights issues.
The nature of the obligations imposed depends on the type of treaty. For example, a treaty may be based on the principles of reciprocity, minimum standards, national treatment, etc. Mexico has executed copyright treaties without reservation or restrictions and, on the whole, has implemented them into domestic law. In any event, treaties are self-applicable under the Mexican Constitution and would not strictly require implementation. Accordingly, treaty provisions are valid to fill the gaps in local law. Treaty provisions prevail in the event of conflict with provisions in local laws.